فهرست منابع
الف) منابع فارسی
جعفرزاده، میرقاسم و اصغر محمودی. «شرایط ماهوی حمایت از اختراع از نگاه رویه قضایی و اداره ثبت اختراعات». تحقیقات حقوقی 42 (1384): 148-69.
جعفریلنگرودی، محمدجعفر. مبسوط در ترمینولوژی حقوق. جلد 1. تهران: نشر گنج دانش، 1378.
سازمان ثبت و اسناد کشور. سمینار ملی نقش مالکیت صنعتی در توسعه اقتصادی. تهران: سازمان ثبت و اسناد کشور، 1374.
معین، محمد. فرهنگ فارسی. جلد 1. تهران: نشر امیرکبیر، 1380.
میرحسینی، حسن. حقوق اختراعات. تهران: نشر بنیاد حقوقی میزان، 1387.
نجفی، حامد. «بررسی تطبیقی شرط ماهوی گام ابتکاری در اختراع». پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، قم: دانشگاه قم،1390.
ب) منابع انگلیسی
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).
AIPPI, Japanese Laws Relating to Industrial Property, 1999.
Bently, Lionel, & Brad Sherman. Intellectual Property Law. London: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Colston, Catherine, Principles of Intellectual Property. London: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 1999.
Cornish, W, R. Intellectual Property, Patent, Copyright, Trademarks and Applied Rights. 4th Ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1999.
Czmus, Akim F. “Biotechnology Protection in Japan, the European Community, and the United States”. Temp Int'l and Comp.L.S. 8 )1994): 435-464.
Dumbraveanu, Radu. “Assessment of Inventive Step.” Master thesis, Lund: Lund University, 2009.
Ertlirxg, Jay. “Korea's Patent Policy and Its Impact on Economic Development a Model for Emerging Country?.” San Diego International Law Journal 11 (2010): 441-480.
Mandel, Geregory. N. “How the Non – Obvious Problem: How the Indeterminate Non-obviousness Standard Produces Excessive Patent Grant.” U.C. Davis Law Review4 (2008): 57-128.
Mcameron, Donald & Sanft, Jordan. ““Secret” Prior Art, Europe and Japan – A Different View.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the AIPLA, Washington D.C., October 31, 2003.
Nelson, Amy. “Obviousness or Inventive Step as Applied to Nucleic Acid Molecules: A Global Perspective.” North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology 6 (2004): 1-40.
OECD, Glossary of Patent Terminology, OCDE, Economic Analysis and Statistics Division Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry 2006.
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, of March 20, 1883, as Last Amended on September 28, 1979.
Restaino Leslie G., Halpern Steven E. and Dr. Eric L. Tang, “Patenting DNA – Related invention in European Union, united states and japan: A Trilateral Approach or a Study in Contrast?.” Ucla Journal of Law & Technology 7 (2003): 1-25.
Saito, Catsuya, and Rosemary Sweency. Center for Advanced Study and Research on Innovation Policy. “Assessment of Inventive Step or Obviousness in the United States, Europe, and Japan.” Accessed May 29, 2004. http://www.law.washington.edu/casrip/harmonization/PDF/obviousness.pdf (on file with the North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology).
Shu, Ge. The Japanese Patent Examination and Training System. Japan: Wipo, 2001.
Toyama, Takahico. Examination Guideline (Inventive Step), in Japan, October 18, 2006.
Wipo, Draft Manual of Patent Practice and Procedure, the Patent Office. 3rd Ed. India: Wipo, 2008.
Wipo, Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. 2nd Ed. Wipo Publication No. 489 (E), 2004.
Wipo, Intellectual Property Reading Material. Geneva: Wipo Publications, 1998.
Wipo, Wipo Model Law for Developing Countries on Inventions. Vol. 1. Geneva: Wipo Publications, 1979.
WiPo. Agreement between the Wipo and the WTO, and Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Geneva, 1997.
WiPo. General Information. Geneva: Wipo Publications, 1990.