ارکلش ویلی، آلکساندر، «تأثیر قواعد آمره حقوق بین الملل بر تفسیر و اجرای قطعنامه های شورای امنیت»، ترجمه و تحقیق سید قاسم زمانی، مجله پژوهشهای حقوقی، ش 7، بهار و تابستان 1384.
زمانی، سید قاسم و جمشید مظاهری، «تحریم های هوشمند شورای امنیت در پرتو قطعنامه 1929: حفظ یا تهدید صلح؟»، مجله حقوقی بین المللی، ش 44، 1390.
زمانی، سید قاسم، «جایگاه قواعد آمره در میان منابع حقوق بین الملل»، مجله حقوقی، ش 22، بهار و تابستان 1377.
شریف، محمد، بررسی دکترین نامحدود بودن صلاحیت شورای امنیت، تهران، انتشارات اطلاعات، چاپ دوم، 1382.
فرجام حقوق بین الملل: نوسان میان تکنیک و تدبیر، ترجمه سید قاسم زمانی و آرامش شهبازی، تهران، مؤسسه مطالعات و پژوهشهای حقوقی شهر دانش، 1389.
فرخی، منصور، «مناسبات متقابل میان تحریمه ای اقتصادی و حقوق بین‌الملل بشر»، رساله دکترای حقوق بین‌الملل، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، 1387.
Búrca, Gráinne de, “The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi”, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol 51, No. 1, Winter 2010; Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1321313.
De Sena, Pasquale and Maria Chiara Vitucci, “The European Courts and the Security Council: Between Dédoublement Fonctionnel and Balancing of Values”, The European Journal of International Law, 2009, Vol. 20, No. 1.
Eeckhout, Piet, “Kadi and Al Barakaat: Luxembourg is Not Texas-or Washington DC”, EJILTALK!, Feb. 25, 2009, http://www.ejiltalk.org/kadi-and-al-barakaat-luxembourg-is-not-texas-or-washington-dc/.
Grand Chamber to examine case about measures taken under United Nations Security Council Resolutions against Al-Qaeda (Nada v. Switzerland: application no. 10593/08), Press release, European Court of Human Rights, no. 769, 20.10.2010.
Holterman, Martin, “Recently in Luxembourg: ECJ Case Law”, Today in Luxembourg, 26-04-2012.
Larik, Joris, “Two Ships in the Night or in the Same Boat Together? Why the European Court of Justice Made the Right Choice in the Kadi Case”, EU Diplomacy Papers 3/2009.
Larissa,Van Den Herik, “The Security Council’s Targeted Sanctions Regimes: In Need of Better Protection of the Individual”, Leiden Journal of International Law, 2007, Vol. 20.
Lavranos, Nikolaos, “Judicial Review of UN Sanctions by the European Court of Justice”, Nordic Journal of International Law, 2009, 78.
Milanović, Marko, “More on Nada v. Switzerland”, EJILTALK!, Dec. 23, 2010.
Milanović, Marko, “The Human Rights Committee’s Views in Sayadi v. Belgium: A Missed Opportunity”, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2009, 1.
Nollkaemper, André, “Rethinking the Supremacy of International Law”, Amsterdam Center for International Law, Working Papers 2009.
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, “State Immunity and Hierarchy of Norms: Why the House of Lords Got It Wrong”, European Journal of International Law, 2007, 18.
Reich, Johannes, “Due Process and Sanctions Targeted Against Individuals Pursuant to Resolution 1267 (1999)”, Yale Journal of International Law, 2008, 33.
Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, Disobeying the Security Council, Oxford University Press, 2011.
Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, “The 1267 Sanctions Regime (Back) Before the General Court of the EU”, EJIL TAKL!, Nov. 16, 2010.
Wet, De and Nollkaemper, “Review of Security Concil Decisions by National Court”, German Yil, 2002, 45.
Ziegler, Katja S., “Strengthening the Rule of Law, but Fragmenting International Law: The Kadi Decision of the ECJ from the Perspective of Human Rights”, Human Rights Law Review, 2009, 9.
Cases:
Al-Jedda v. Secretary of State for Defence, Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Judgment of 29 March 2006, House of Lords December 2007; available at www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk .
Case Concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium/Spain) (Second Phase), ICJ Reports, 1970.
ICTY, Prosecutor v Tadić, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, 2 October 1995, Case IT-94-1-I.
Judgment Of The General Court (Fourth Chamber) In Joined Cases T‑439/10 and T‑440/10 (Fulmen and Fereydoun Mahmoudian v. Council of the European Union), 21 March 2012.
Nabil Sayadi and Patricia Vinck v. Belgium, CCPR/C/94/D/1472/2006, 29 December 2008.
European Court Reports, 2005, Case T-315/01, in http://eurpa.eu.int/eur-lexllexuriserv.html.
Joined Cases C- 402&415/05 P Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council and Commission of the European Union [2008] ECR I- 6351.
Bundesgericht [BGer] [Federal Court], Nov. 14, 2007, 133 Entscheidungen des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts [BGE] II (Switz).
ECJ Case C-402/05 P Kadi , judgment of 3 September 2008, paras. 314–317, 326., available at < curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/form.pl?lang=en>.
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 April 2012, Manufacturing Support and Procurement Kala Naft Co., Tehran v. Vouncil of the European Union(Case T-509/10), European Court Reports 2012.
Documents:
Council Decision of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP, Official Journal of the European Union, 27.7.2010.
Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010, Official Journal of the European Union, 24.3.2012.
)