The enactment of Article 62 of the Permanent Provisions Law of Development Programs and its predominant interpretation has entrenched the theory of consensual validity in property transactions, albeit while creating conflicts with certain foundational principles upheld by its proponents, such as the principle of presumption of validity (asl-e sehhah). This judicial and doctrinal shift has generated significant challenges for the public, the judiciary, and the government, particularly in cases where transactions executed through informal documents have been contested despite parties’ good-faith reliance on governmental authorities and the State Organization for Registration of Deeds and Properties. When such transactions are later invalidated by judicial rulings, the resulting legal uncertainty not only undermines public trust but also disrupts the stability and security of property transactions, potentially facilitating financial corruption. To mitigate these adverse effects, legislative intervention is necessary - either by mandating formalization for transactions involving registered properties or by rendering unregistered transactions inadmissible against third parties and the government, in line with comparative legal frameworks. Consequently, the Expediency Discernment Council’s pending approval of the proposed bill - which would invalidate unregistered property transactions and bar their judicial enforcement - is both urgent and justified.