الف) منابع فارسی
- احمدوند، بهناز. (1402). مطالعه تطبیقی حمایت از حریم خصوصی و حفاظت از داده‌های شخصی در اینترنت. تهران: انتشارات خرسندی.
- انصاری، باقر. (1393). حقوق ارتباط جمعی. چاپ هفتم. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
- باستانی، برومند. (1386). جرایم کامپیوتری و اینترنتی، جلوه‌ای نوین از بزهکاری. چاپ سوم. تهران: انتشارات بهنامی.
- حبیبی، همایون. (1395). حق بر حریم خصوصی در شبکه‌های اجتماعی. مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، ۱۹(۷۵).
- داورپناه، مسعود. (1395). حمایت از مصرف‌کننده در حقوق رقابت و حقوق مصرف‌کننده. ارائه‌شده در کنگره بین‌المللی حقوق ایران.
- رهبری، ابراهیم. (1398). حقوق رقابت در عرصه مالکیت‌های فکری. جلد 1 و 2. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
- صادقی مقدم، محمدحسن و بهنام غفاری فارسانی. (1390). روح حقوق رقابت: مطالعه تطبیقی در اهداف حقوق رقابت. مجله حقوقی دادگستری، (73).
Doi:10.22106/jlj.2011.11093
- کاتوزیان، ناصر. (1380). فلسفه حقوق. تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
ب) منابع انگلیسی
- Ahlborn, Christian & Jorge Padilla. (2008). From Fairness to Welfare: Implications for the Assessment of Unilateral Conduct under EC Competition Law. In: European Competition Law Annual 2007: A Reformed Approach to Article 82 EC. edited by Claus- Dieter Ehlermann and Mel Marquis. United Kingdom: Hart Publishing.
- Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. (2011). Opinion 15/2011 on the definition of consent (WP 187). European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2011/wp187_en.pdf.
- Averitt, Neil W. & Robert H. Lande. (1997). Consumer Sovereignty: A Unified Theory of Antitrust and Consumer Protection Law. Antitrust Law Journal, 65(3). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1134798
- Bundesgerichtshof. (2023). Decision KVR 69/ 19. Accessed November 30, 2024. https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidung/EN/Entscheidungen/BGH-KVR-69-19.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1.
- Bundeskartellam (Germany federal cartel office). (2023a). Statement of objections issued against Google’s data processing terms. Accessed June 2024. Available at: https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Meldung/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2023/11_01_2023_Google_Data_Processing_Terms.html.
- Bundeskartellamt (Germany federal cartel office). (2019). Facebook Case B6-22/16. Accessed June 2, 2024. https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidung/EN/Fallberichte/Missbrauchsaufsicht/2019/B6-22-16.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3
- Bundeskartellamt (Germany federal cartel office). (2023b). Decision, B6- 55/ 20, Meta Quest Case. Accessed June 2, 2024. https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidung/EN/Fallberichte/Missbrauchsaufsicht/2022/B6-55-20.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4.
- CJEU (Court of Justice of European Union). (2010). Case C- 280/ 08 P, Deutsche Telekom v EU Commission. Accessed October 3, 2024. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:62008CJ0280.
- CJEU) Court of Justice of European Union). (1979). Case 85/76 Hoffmann- La Roche & Co AG v Commission of the European Communities. Accessed November 30, 2024. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:61976CJ0085
- Deutscher, Elias. (2018). How to Measure Privacy-Related Consumer Harm in Merger Analysis? A Critical Reassessment of the EU Commission’s Merger Control in Data-Driven Markets. EUI Working Paper Law, 13.
- EDPS (European Data Protection Supervisor). (2016). Opinion 8/2016 on coherent enforcement of fundamental rights in the age of big data. Report. Brussel: EDPS.
- EU Commission. (1993). EU Council Directive on unfair terms in consumer contracts, 93/13/EEC. Accessed 4 December, 2024. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31993L0013
- EU Commission. (2004a). Decision, COMP/M. 7217, Facebook-WhatsApp. Accessed October 2, 2024. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7217_20141003_20310_3962132_EN.pdf
- EU Commission. (2004b). Decision, COMP/C-3/37.792, Microsoft. Accessed October 1, 2024. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/37792/37792_4177_1.pdf
- EU Commission. (2009). Decision, COMP/C-3/39.530, Microsoft. Accessed October 1, 2024. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/39530/39530_2671_5.pdf
- EU Commission. (2010). Decision, COMP/M. 5727, Microsoft-Yahoo! Search Business. Brussel: EU Commission.
- EU Commission. (2016). Decision, COMP/M.8124, Microsoft/LinkedIn. Accessed October 3, 2024. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m8124_1349_5.pdf
- European Commission. (1997, January 22). Green paper on vertical restraints in EC competition policy (COM(96) 721 final). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:51996DC0721.
- European Commission. (2004). Commission notice-Guidelines on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty. Official Journal of the European Union, 101. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2004:101:0097:0118:EN:PDF
- European Commission. (2009, February 24). Communication from the Commission - Guidance on the Commission's enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings (2009/C 45/02). Official Journal of the European Union, 45. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52009XC0224(01)
- Ezrachi, Ariel. (2021). EU Competition Law: An Analytical Guide to the Leading Cases. 7nd ed. United Kingdom: Hart Publishing.
- Gugler, Philippe. (2015). Transparency and Competition Policy in an Imperfectly Competitive World. In: The Oxford Handbook of Economic and Institutional Transparency. edited by Jens Forssback, Lars Oxelheim, 144-165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kaminski, Margot E. (2022). The Case for Data Privacy Rights Or “Please, a Little Optimism”. Notre Dame Law Review Reflection, (97). https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/faculty-articles/1556.
- Lianos, Ioannis. (2013). Some Reflections on the Question of the Goals of EU Competition Law. CLES Working Paper Series. SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/ssrn.2235875.
- Lynskey, Orla. (2015). Deconstructing Data Protection: The Added- Value of a Right to Data Protection in the EU Legal Order. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. doi.org/10.1017/S0020589314000244
- Motta, Massimo. (2004). Competition Policy: Theory and Practice. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Publication.
- OECD. (2008). Glossary of Statistics. Paris: OECD.
- OECD. (2016). Big Data: Bringing Competition Policy to the Digital ERA. Report. Paris: OECD.
- Ohlhausen, Maureen & Alexander, p. Okuliar. (2015). Competition, Consumer Protection, and the Right [Approach] to Privacy. Antitrust Law Journal, 80(1).
- Pepper, Richard & Paul Gilbert. (2015). Privacy Considerations in European Merger Control: A Square Peg for a Round Hole. CPI Antitrust Chronicle.
- Pinarm, Akman. (2012). The Concept of Abuse in EU Competition Law, Law and Economic Approaches (Hart Studies in Competition Law). United Kingdom: Hart Publishing.
- Rancati, Luca. (2019). The intersection between Antitrust and Data Protection. Lessons from the Facebook/Whatsapp merger and the Bundeskartellamt’s decision on Facebook’s terms and conditions. Master Thesis. Université catholique de Louvain.
- Samuelson., Paul A. (1938). A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s behavior. Economica Journal, 5(17). doi.org/10.2307/2548836.
- Solove, Daniel J. (2021). The Myth of the Privacy Paradox. George Washington Law Review, 1. Accessed September 12, 2024. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3536265.
- Stucke, Maurice & Allen Grunes. (2016). Big Data and Competition Policy. Oxford: Oxford Publication.
- Václav, Janeček. (2018). Ownership of personal data in the Internet of Things. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(5). doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2018.04.007
- Volmar, Maximilian N. & Katharina O. Helmdach. (2018). Protecting consumers and their data through competition law? Rethinking abuse of dominance in light of the Federal Cartel Office’s Facebook investigation. European Competition Journal, 14(2-3). Doi: 10.1080/17441056.2018.1538033.
- Westin, Alan F. (1967). Privacy and Freedom. New York, United States: Atheneum.
