Journal of Legal Research

Journal of Legal Research

Intellectual Property Protection for Graphical User Interfaces

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Mohammad Mahdi Kateb Damghani 1
Bagher Ansari 2
1 M.A. in Intellectual Property Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Human Rights Law and Environmental Law Department, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
10.48300/jlr.2022.354386.2140
Abstract
A graphical user interface is a fundamental part of any software application as it enables users to interact with an application’s functionality, allowing interaction between computer software and hardware. The hybrid nature is a feature of GUIs. Therefore, it can qualify for all three forms of intellectual property protection: patent, copyright, and trademark. Each of these three forms has its pros and cons in terms of protecting graphical user interfaces. However, industrial design rights eventually seem to be the best system for protecting graphical user interfaces. Therefore, this study mainly focuses on the industrial design protection for the GUIs as well as the industrial design protection of GUIs in WTO member states, and in some cases, a comparison has been made with the Iranian legal system. A review of different legal systems indicates that in cases where the user interface is to be supported in more than one country, and at the international level, some points such as the scope of protection, filing routes and priority rights should be considered, and suggestions have been presented for modification of the protection system of GUIs as well as synchronization of protections. Furthermore, there are legal issues with respect to cloud computing and graphical user interfaces that need to be considered, including the protection of the intellectual property of both the user and the provider.
Keywords
Graphical User Interface
Industrial Design
Intellectual Property
Cloud Computing
Law

  •  

    • “IaaS vs. PaaS vs. SaaS”. Accessed May 18, 2022. https://www.ibm.com/cloud/learn/iaas-paas-saas.
    • Ahmed, Hassan. “The Copyrightability of Computer Program Graphical User Interfaces”. Southwestern University Law Review, 30, (2001). Available at: https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/journals/JlLawInfoSci/2003/2.html?query=%225%20Albany%20Law%20Journal%20291%22
    • Boule III, John R. “Redefining Reality: Why Design Patent Protection Should Expand to the Virtual World”. American University Law Review, 66, 4(2017), 1113-1157. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr/vol66/iss4/5
    • Buyya, Rajkumar, Christian Vecchiola and S. Thamarai Selvi. Mastering Cloud Computing: Foundations and Applications Programming. Amsterdam; Boston: Morgan Kaufmann, 2013.
    • Carlson, Mat D. “Intellectual Property Protection for Computer Icons: The Trademark Alternative”. University of San Francisco Law Review, 31, (1996).
    • Case C-393/09 Bezpečnostní softwarová asociace–Svaz softwarové ochrany v. Ministerstvo Kultury (2011).
    • Chen, Rain, Sung-Yun Shen and Su-Ping Tan. “Design Patents for Animated Images: Development Trends”. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19, (2014), 43-48. https://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/26511
    • Cook, Trevor. “Enforcement Directive and Harmonisation of Remedies for Intellectual Property Infringement in the EU”, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20, (2015), 264-269. https://www.wilmerhale.com/en/insights/publications/enforcement-directive-and-harmonisation-of-remedies-for-intellectual-property-infringement-in-the-eu
    • Cruz, Aaron Peter. “International IP: Harmonizing the Protection of Graphical User Interfaces”. Connecticut Journal of International Law, 33, 1(2017), 137-161.
    • Dubuisson, Thomas. “IP protection for graphical user interfaces in the EU, US and China”. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 10, 10(2015), 767-774. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpv142
    • Duranti, Luciana, and Corinne Rogers. Trusting Records in the Cloud. UK: Facet Publishing, 2019.
    • Ghabooli Dorafshan, Mohammad Mahdi, and Saeed Mohseni. "Legal Study on the Legal Protection of the Industrial Design (The Comparative Study of the Background and Concept)." Journal of Monetary & Financial Economics 17, no. 32 (2011).
    • Ghazaghi, Hadi. "Patent - Graphical User Interface for Controlling and Monitoring the Air Conditioning and Lighting Systems" (2014)
    • Hemelrijk, Casper. “New Technologies: IP Protection for Graphical User Interfaces”. Novagraaf, Accessed May 18, 2022. https://www.novagraaf.com/en/insights/new-technologies-ip-protection-graphical-user-interfaces.
    • Ho Young Lee, Ji Young Moon and Min Ju Kim. "Design Patent - Display Screen or Portion Thereof with Graphical User Interface in Mobile Phone" (2013)
    • Hochberg, Peter. “Design Patents and Graphical User Interfaces”. Bar Journal Intellectual Property Law, 2017, 1-3. Available at: https://www.walterhav.com/files/2017/12/
    • Ingrid & Isabel, LLC v. Baby Be Mine, LLC, 70 F. Supp. 3d 1105 (Dist. Court 2014).
    • Jennings, Brendan and Rolf Stadler. “Resource management in clouds: Survey and research challenges”. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 23, 3(2015), 567-619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-014-9307-7
    • Kafeza, Irene, Eleanna Kafeza, and Epameinondas Panas. “Contracts in cloud computing,” 1-8. IEEE, 2014.
    • Koukal, Pavel. “Graphical User Interfaces and Their Protection in the European Union”, in book Horizons in Computer Science Research (Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, 2018).
    • Kurdi, Heba A, Safwat Hamad, and Amal Khalifa. “Towards a friendly user interface on the cloud,” 148-57. Springer, 2014.
    • Lee, Peter and Madhavi Sunder. “The Law of Look and Feel”. Southern California Law Review, 90, (2017), 529-591. Available in https://southerncalifornialawreview.com/
    • Levi, SD and KC Riedel. “Cloud computing: understanding the business and legal Issues”. White Paper, 2010, http://us.practicallaw.com/8-501-5479
    • Logeais, Elisabeth. “Design Protection for Graphical User Interfaces”. International Chamber of Commerce, 20 April 2018. Available in https://iccwbo.org/news-publications/policies-reports/design-protection-graphical-user-interfaces-guis/
    • Millard, Christopher J. Cloud computing law. Oxford: Oxford University Press Oxford, 2013.
    • Mirhosseini, Seyyed Hassan. "The Law of Industrial Designs." Tehran, Mizan Legal Foundation, (2016)
    • Mirhosseini, Seyyed Hassan. "The Law of Trademarks." Tehran, Mizan Legal Foundation, (2011)
    • Moffat, Viva R. “Mutant copyrights and backdoor patents: The problem of overlapping intellectual property protection”. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 19, (2004), 1473-1532. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=972358
    • Neophytou, John Peter. “Copyright for graphical user interfaces”. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 6, 7(2011), 436-437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpr056
    • Panjia, “On the application of punitive damages in the field of patent infringement - Comments on Article 65 of the "Draft Revision of the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (Draft for Comments)”, Journal of Chongqing University, 20, 2(2014), 115-122. (Translated by Google)
    • Poltorak, Alexander I, and Paul J Lerner. Essentials of licensing intellectual property. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
    • Rahbari, Ebrahim. "Technology transfer law." Tehran: Organization for the Study and Compilation of University Humanities Books (2014).
    • Rahbari, Ebrahim. "Trade Secret Law." Tehran: Organization for the Study and Compilation of University Humanities Books (2009).
    • Risch, Michael. “Functionality and graphical user interface design patents”. Stanford Technology Law Review, 17, (2013), 1-49. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2310132
    • Rolling, Jane M. “No Protection, No Progress for Graphical User Interfaces”. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 2, 1(1998), 157-194. Available at: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/iplr/vol2/iss1/5
    • Samuelson, Pamela. “Computer Programs, User Interfaces, and Section 102(b) of the Copyright Act of 1976: A Critique of Lotus v. Paperback”. Law and Contemporary Problems, 55, 2(1992), 311-353. Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol55/iss2/17
    • Samuelson, Pamela. “Protecting user interfaces through copyright: The debate”. University of Pittsburgh Law School Pittsburgh, PA 15260, 1989. 97-103.
    • Samuelson, Pamela. “Why the look and feel of software user interfaces should not be protected by copyright law”. Communications of the ACM, 32, 5(1989), 563-572. https://doi.org/10.1145/63485.63487
    • Schallop, Michael J. “Protecting User Interfaces: Not as Easy as 1-2-3”. Emory Law Journal, 45, (1996), 1533-1582.
    • Shakeri, Zahra and Soheila Nurali. "The Proper Legal System to Protection of Websites and Softwares Look and Feel." Journal of Private Law Research 35, no. 9 (2022): 120-155.
    • Shakeri, Zahra, and Soheila Nourali. "The Trade Dress Institution: Looking Again to Trademark System." Journal of Comparative Law 5, no. 2 (2019): 97-120.
    • Shakeri, Zahra, Saeed Habiba, and Soheila Nurali. "Protection of Products Design and Packaging in the Form of Branches of Intellectual Property Rights." Journal Encyclopedia of Economic Law 23, no. 10 (2017): 90-111.
    • Skon, Linda. “Copyright Protection of Computer User Interfaces: Creative Ferment in the Courts.” Arizona State Law Journal, 27, (1995).
    • Stigler, Rachel. “Ooey GUI: The Messy Protection of Graphical User Interfaces”. Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 12, 3(2014), 213-252. Available in https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njtip/vol12/iss3/3
    • Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc., 505 US 763 (Supreme Court 1992).
    • Zarkalam, Sattar and Mohammadhassan Mehvari. Tehran, "Legal Protection for Software Developers." Organization for the Study and Compilation of University Humanities Books, (2015).
    • Zarkalam, Sattar. "Literary and Artistic Property Rights." Tehran, Organization for the Study and Compilation of University Humanities Books, (2009).
Journal of Legal Research
Volume 23, Issue 57
Spring 2024
Pages 465-504