Confession is the nobler of reasons, the nobler of truth discoverers. Confession sometimes occurs before the judge in court and sometimes outside the court. The former is referred to as judicial confession and the latter as non-judicial confession. Regarding the basis of criminal sentences based on non-judicial confessions, when the confession is the only documentary evidence of the case, according to Note 2 of Article 119 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Note 2 of Article 218 of the Islamic Penal Code approved in 2013, the non-judicial confessions are not competent to prove in the case He knows the "reason". It seems that the criminal legislator, relying on evidence such as the narrations that tell about the necessity of confession before the judge, the lack of the place and audience for confession, i.e. the lack of the institution of the prosecution in the judicial cycle of the Islamic judicial system, the institutionalized caution in the criminal policy of Islam in proving crimes, has inclined to the conclusion that To demote non-judicial evidence from "reason" to "judicial evidence". In the meantime, while rejecting the, there should not be any obstacle to the possibility of the evidence presented in the prosecution as "evidence", unless the criminal law with The attention of gratitude and caution institutionalized in the criminal policy of Islam in proving crimes should decide the slips of guilty people, and accepting this decision also requires not violating the rights of people in the crimes of human rights.
Ansari, Masoud, Taheri, Mohammad Ali, Encyclopaedia of Private Laws, Volume 1, Tehran: Mihrab Fikar Publishing House, 1386. )in Persian)
Bahrami Khoshkar, Mohammad, "Non-mujtahid judgment in Imami jurisprudence with an approach to the opinion of Imam Khomeini (RA)", Strategy Quarterly, 65 (2011), 69-92. )in Persian)
Javidi, Mojtabi, "The Place of Reasonable Ways in Imamiya Penal Jurisprudence", Islamic Jurisprudence and Law Research Quarterly, 33 (2012), 54-35. )in Persian)
Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jaafar, Encyclopaedia of Civil and Trade Laws, Tehran: Ganj Danesh. )in Persian)
Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jaafar, Expanded on Legal Terminology, Volume 1, Tehran: Ganj Danesh Publications, 1378. )in Persian)
Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jaafar, Encyclopaedia of Islamic Judicial Sciences, second volume, Tehran: Ganj Danesh, 2011. )in Persian)
Jahankhah, Ali, "The Place of the Basis of Reason in Shia Jurisprudence", Political Science Quarterly, 17 (2010), 183-210. )in Persian)
Haji Dehabadi, Ahmad, "Invalidity of non-judicial confessions in criminal matters", Islamic Law Journal, 39 (2012), 113-140. )in Persian)
Khademi Kosha, Mohammad Ali, "Conceptualization of Gratitude Commands", Jurisprudence Journal, 4 (2011), 107-131. )in Persian)
Statements of Hojjatul Islam Montazeri, Legal Deputy of the Ministry of Justice, August 10, 1370, 7 )in Persian)
Justice Minister Shushtri's statement, Salam newspaper, August 2, 1369, 5.
Zaret, Abbas, Hajizadeh, Hamidreza, evidence to prove the case, Kashan: Qunomdar Publishing, 2018. )in Persian)
Shambiati, Houshang, Special Criminal Law, first volume, Tehran: Wistar Publishing, 1377. )in Persian)
Shams Natri, Mohammad Ibrahim, "Principle of acquittal and cases of deviation from it in criminal law", Qom Higher Education Complex Magazine, 14 (2008), 65-88. )in Persian)
Abdullahi, Jafar, "Approach of Gratitude in Islamic Shari'ah and its Reflection in Iranian Jurisprudence and Legislation", Discourse on Fiqh and Principles, 3 (2017), 33-46. )in Persian)
Fayazi, Masoud, "The Nature of Signature Orders", Islamic Studies: Fiqh and Usul, 102 (2014), 109-129. )in Persian)
Katouzian, Nasser, Proof and proof of proof, first volume, Mizan publication, third edition, 2014. )in Persian)
Mohsass, Marzieh, "Compatibility of Spouses in the Way of Negligence with Emphasis on Religious Teachings", 2 (2012), 41-54. )in Persian)
Madani, Seyyed Jalaluddin, Evidence to prove the case, Tehran: Padayar Publications, 2017. )in Persian)
Ismail Shushtri (the then Minister of Justice), the deliberations of the Islamic Council, the fourth period, the 55th session, dated 22 December 1371. )in Persian)
Statements of Seyyed Ali Akbar Hosseini (Representative of the Majlis), the deliberations of the Islamic Council, the fourth period, the 55th meeting, dated 22 December 1371. )in Persian)
Marashi, Seyyed Hassan, A New Perspective in Islamic Criminal Law, Tehran: Mizan Publishing House, 2013. )in Persian)
Mirkhalili, Seyyed Mahmoud, State prevention of delinquency, Qom: Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought, 2018. )in Persian)
Najafi Abrandabadi, Ali Hossein; Hashem Beigi, Hamid, Encyclopedia of Criminology, Tehran: Ganj Danesh, 2017. )in Persian)
Yousefi, Iman, preliminary research in criminal procedure. Tehran: Nash Jangal, 2013. )in Persian)
Al-Hasari, Ahmad, The Science of Jurisprudence, Volume II, Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi Publications, 1416 AH. )in Arabic)
Hosseini, Seyyed Kazem, Al-Qada fi Fiqh al-Islami, Qom: Islamic Thought Forum, 1405 AH. )in Arabic)
Hali, Jafar bin Hasan bin Yahya, Sharia' al-Islam fi masal halal va haram, Qom: Ismailian Institute, 1408 AH. )in Arabic)
Hali, Mohammad Bin Idris, Al-Sar al-Hawi for Tahrir al-Fatawi, Qom: Islamic Publications Office, 1410 AH. )in Arabic)
Shahroudi, Seyyed Mahmood, Researches in the Science of Islam, Qom: Institute of Islamic Fiqh Encyclopaedia According to the Ahl al-Bayt (A.S.), 1426 AH. )in Arabic)
Safi Golpayegani, Lotfollah, Jame al-Ahkam, second volume, Qom: Hazrat Masoumeh Publications, 2015. )in Arabic)
Tusi, Muhammad bin Hasan, Tahzeeb al-Ahkam, volume 10, Beirut: Dar al-Azwa, 1406 AH. )in Arabic)
Ameli, Muhammad bin Hassan, Al-Shia's Tools, Volume 28, Qom: Al-Al-Bayt Institute (AS), 1416 AH. )in Arabic)
Sadati,S. M. M. , Foroughi,F. and Jalili,A. ,. (2024). Validation of the Evidentiary Power of the Confessions Presented in the Prosecution. Journal of Legal Research, 23(59), 453-478. doi: 10.48300/jlr.2023.365179.2183
MLA
Sadati,S. M. M. , , Foroughi,F. , and Jalili,A. ,. . "Validation of the Evidentiary Power of the Confessions Presented in the Prosecution", Journal of Legal Research, 23, 59, 2024, 453-478. doi: 10.48300/jlr.2023.365179.2183
HARVARD
Sadati S. M. M., Foroughi F., Jalili A. ,. (2024). 'Validation of the Evidentiary Power of the Confessions Presented in the Prosecution', Journal of Legal Research, 23(59), pp. 453-478. doi: 10.48300/jlr.2023.365179.2183
CHICAGO
S. M. M. Sadati, F. Foroughi and A. ,. Jalili, "Validation of the Evidentiary Power of the Confessions Presented in the Prosecution," Journal of Legal Research, 23 59 (2024): 453-478, doi: 10.48300/jlr.2023.365179.2183
VANCOUVER
Sadati S. M. M., Foroughi F., Jalili A. ,. Validation of the Evidentiary Power of the Confessions Presented in the Prosecution. Journal of Legal Research, 2024; 23(59): 453-478. doi: 10.48300/jlr.2023.365179.2183