In spite of three decades "Implementation of Safeguard Agreements in I.R. of Iran" and three years concrete verifications by the IAEA, the issue was informed to the UN Security Council in accordance with art. 12 of the IAEA's Statute. The Council by the statement of its President (29 March 2006), inter alia, calls on Iran to comply with the resolutions of the Board of Governors and implement without delay all transparency or confidence-building measures necessary to clarify the outstanding issues. Nevertheless, emphasizing the importance of continuing its peaceful nuclear programme for its supreme interests (development not military nature), Iran refers to legal disputes between it and the IAEA as well as three European countries on the implementation of INFCIR/214 (1974) as a basis for their illegality i.e. they violated international nuclear rights of Iran, as a NPT state party, to peaceful nuclear development. This article analyzes the current process of Iran nuclear programme from the Board of Governors to the Security Council, in particular, some remarks on the interpretation of Iran nuclear rights in the light of international nuclear law.
Saed, N. (2006). The Pros and Cons on Iran's Nuclear Rights: From IAEA Board of Governors to UN Security Council. Journal of Legal Research, 5(9), 11-42.
MLA
Nader Saed. "The Pros and Cons on Iran's Nuclear Rights: From IAEA Board of Governors to UN Security Council". Journal of Legal Research, 5, 9, 2006, 11-42.
HARVARD
Saed, N. (2006). 'The Pros and Cons on Iran's Nuclear Rights: From IAEA Board of Governors to UN Security Council', Journal of Legal Research, 5(9), pp. 11-42.
VANCOUVER
Saed, N. The Pros and Cons on Iran's Nuclear Rights: From IAEA Board of Governors to UN Security Council. Journal of Legal Research, 2006; 5(9): 11-42.