Intervention of Judges for controlling of laws in comparing to constitution differ from country to other country. "Political control" and "Judicial review" are two method for this aim. In Iran, forecast of "shuraye neghahban", according to one opinion, forbid Judges from controlling of law and declaring of contradiction to constitution. In contrast with the opinion, we support the view that foresee rights and obligations of judges for this control.
Khodabakhshi Shalamzari, A., & Abedinzadeh Shahri, N. (2004). Intervention of Judges for Controlling of Laws in Comparing to the Constitution (Comparative Law & Iran). Journal of Legal Research, 3(6), 33-60.
MLA
Abdollah Khodabakhshi Shalamzari; Nayyereh Abedinzadeh Shahri. "Intervention of Judges for Controlling of Laws in Comparing to the Constitution (Comparative Law & Iran)". Journal of Legal Research, 3, 6, 2004, 33-60.
HARVARD
Khodabakhshi Shalamzari, A., Abedinzadeh Shahri, N. (2004). 'Intervention of Judges for Controlling of Laws in Comparing to the Constitution (Comparative Law & Iran)', Journal of Legal Research, 3(6), pp. 33-60.
VANCOUVER
Khodabakhshi Shalamzari, A., Abedinzadeh Shahri, N. Intervention of Judges for Controlling of Laws in Comparing to the Constitution (Comparative Law & Iran). Journal of Legal Research, 2004; 3(6): 33-60.
)