نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق، واحد دامغان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دامغان، ایران.
2 استادیار، گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق، واحد دامغان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، دامغان، ایران.
3 استادیار، گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
One of the involved issues in precedent for Deficiency of the rules is dispossession lawsuit aboat Joint property. This lawsuit is subject to Special rules as such recognition and Solving Its ambiguities realizes Justly trial. So we started writing this article and The consequence was that in Judicial process; Judges do not have certain criterion for cognizance the ownership of the claimant and recognition the defendant in this lawsuit; Also, at the time of death or disability or change of one of the claimants or multiple defendants, they are confused; And in the stage of enforcement of judgments, these ambiguities were more be revealed So that How to deliver and manage the joint property and determine the standing property have serious ambiguity. In order to resolve these ambiguities;we hang on Article 43 of the Civil judgments enforcement Act and General Assembly of the Supreme Court vote No. 672 and Its defects were solved with Acceptance of two principles " The result of the dispossession lawsuit aboat Joint property transmits to all owners" and " Resolving disputes between partners depends on permission".
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)