نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق کیفری و جرم شناسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.
3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
By studying Iran's criminal policy and its developments, we realize the fact that the criminal legislator has used two strategies in every phase of criminal legislation: the first strategy; The strategy related to Sharia standards and the second strategy; The strategy is related to governmental or customary standards. The legislator, despite being aware of the differences between religions, has always considered these two strategies as integral principles of criminal policy. This research with descriptive-analytical method has achieved the important fact that these two strategies existed in all legislative stages of the General Penal Act 1304 to the Islamic Act Code 1392 and only the share of each has changed; Apparently, these two strategies are competing with each other, but in fact, despite the differences, the common point that can be seen in the legislative process is the preservation of both strategies, which is a legislative phenomenon, and the legislator can achieve greater compromise and homogenization by eliminating conflicts and harmonizing these two strategies. These two types of achievement are discussed in detail in this research.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)