الف) منابع فارسی
- افشاری، فاطمه و آرین پتفت، «موانع احیای حقوق عامه در حقوق ایران و راهکارهای تحقق مطلوب آن»، دانش حقوق عمومی، 10، 33(1400)، 111-140.
Doi: 10.22034/qjplk.2021.231
- پروین، خیرالله و فاطمه اصحابی. «دعاوی متضمن نفع عمومی ظرفیتی در احیای حقوق عامه؛ مطالعه موردی تطبیقی». پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب، 9، 34(1401)، 3-32.
Doi: 10.22091/csiw.2022.8223.2280
- حبیبی درگاه، بهنام. «مفهوم اصل دسترسی به دادگستری، ویژگی و جلوههای آن»، مطالعات حقوقی، 10، 27(1397)، 61-90.
Doi: 10.22099/jls.2018.12550.1619
- خلفرضایی، حسین. «بررسی وظایف و کارویژههای دادگاه قانون اساسی فدرال آلمان». بررسیهای حقوق عمومی، 2، 3(1392)، 1-26.
- رستمی، ولی و محمد کبگانی. «تضمینات اساسیِ حقها و آزادیهای بنیادین: واکاوی آیین دادخواهی اساسی در فرانسه و انگلستان». مطالعات حقوق عمومی، 51، 2(1400)، 497-517.
https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2018.256450.1726
- زولر، الیزابت و سیدمجتبی واعظی. درآمدی بر حقوق عمومی، چاپ سوم. تهران: انتشارات جاودانه، 1396.
- شجاعیان، خدیجه. «مؤلفههای اصل حاکمیت قانون در پرتو تعریف سازمان ملل متحد»، فصلنامه جستارهای حقوق عمومی، 1، 3، (1396): 71-90.
- طهماسبی، علی. «مطالعه تطبیقی شرایط دعوای گروهی در حقوق آمریکا و کانادا: آموزههایی برای حقوق ایران». پژوهشهای حقوق تطبیقی، 18، 3(1393)، 153-175.
http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-10986-fa.html
- فریدزاده، غزاله و محمدحسن کبگانی. «انواع روش دسترسی به دادرس اساسی با تأکید بر دادخواهی اساسی»، فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی، 85، (بهار 1398)، 321-348.
- نقرهکار، محمدصالح. نقش دادستان در صیانت از حقوق عامه. تهران: انتشارات جنگل، 1388.
- واعظی، سیدمجتبی. حقوق اداری 1، تهران: میزان، 1400.
- هداوند، مهدی. «نظارت قضایی: تحلیل مفهومی، تحولات اساسی». حقوق اساسی، 7، 9(1387)، 7- 56.
ب) منابع خارجی
- Albiston, Catherine & Laura Beth Nielsen. “The Procedural Attack on Civil Rights: The Empirical Reality of Buckhannon for the Private Attorney General”, Los Angeles Law Review, 54, (2007), 1-48. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=937114
- Albiston, Catherine. “Democracy, Civil Society, and Public Interest Law”, Wisconsin Law Review, 2(2018), 187-214. https://repository-dev.law.wisc.edu/s/uwlaw/media/40004
- Aleinikoff, T. Alexander. “Detaining Plenary Power: The Meaning and Impact of Zadvydas v. Davis”, Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 16, (2001-2002).
- Aron, Nan. Liberty and Justice For All: Public Interest Law In The 1980s And Beyond. USA: Westview Press, 2018.
- Bakshi. P.M. Whytes & Co’s Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by P. M. New Delhi: Whytes & Co., 2018.
- Bettinger-Lopez, Caroline, Davida Finger, Meetali Jain, JoNel Newman, Sarah Paoletti, and Deborah M. Weissman. “Redefining Human Rights Lawyering Through the Lens of Critical Theory: Lessons for Pedagogy and Practice”, Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy, XVIII, 3(2011), 337-399. available at https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/536
- Bhushan, Prashant. “Supreme Court and PIL: Changing Perspectives Under Liberalisation”. Economic and Political Weekly, 39, 18(2004), 1770-1774. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4414951
- Cole, George & Stanisław Frankowski. Abortion and Protection of the Human Fetus: Legal Problems in a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987.
- Cooley, Amanda Harmon. “American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)”, in Encyclopedia of Social Networks, Vol 1, edited by George A. Barnett. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 2011.
- Desai, Ashok and S. Muralidhar. Public Interest Litigation: Potential and Problems. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2000.
- Dua, Bhagwan D. “A Study in Executive-Judicial Conflict: The Indian Case”, Asian Survey, 23, 4(1983), 463-483. https://doi.org/10.2307/2644233
- Freeman, Andrew D. & Juli E. Farris. “Grassroots Impact Litigation: Mass Filing of Small Claims”. University of San Francisco Law Review, 26, (1991), 261.
- Friedman Goldstein, Leslie. Contemporary Cases in Women’s Rights. Madison: The University of Wisconsin, 1994.
- Goodpaster, Gary S. “The Constitution and Fundamental Rights”, Arizona Law Review, 15, 479(1973).
- Grossman, Claudio. Impact Litigation at the American University Washington College of Law. Washington: Washington College of Law, 2016.
- Hershkoff, Helen & David Hollander. “Rights into Action: Public Interest Litigation in the United States” in Many Roads to Justice: the Law-Related Work of Ford Foundation Grantees around the World, edited by Mary McClymont & Stephen Golub. USA: Ford Foundation, 2000.
- Houck, Oliver A. “With Charity for All”. Yale Law Journal, 93, 8(1984), 1415-1563. available at http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/16290
- Kagan, Robert A. Adversarial Legalism: The AmericanWay of Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001.
- Kassin, Saul M. & Rebecca J Norwick. “Why People Waive Their Miranda Rights: The Power of Innocence”. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 2(2004), 211-221. Doi: 10.1023/b:lahu.0000022323.74584.f5.
- Maranlou, Sahar. Access to Justice in Iran: Women Perceptions and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
- Mate, Manoj. Public Interest Litigation and the Transformation of the Supreme Court of India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
- Mcilwain, Charles Howard. Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1947.
- Open Society Foundations. Leveraging the SDGs for Inclusive Growth: Delivering Access to Justice for All. OECD, 2016, 1-20.
- Otteh, Joseph. Litigating for Justice: A Primer on Public Interest Litigation (PIL). Lagos, Nigeria: Access to Justice, 2012.
- Peiris, G.L. “Public Interest Litigation in the Indian Subcontinent: Current Dimensions”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 40, 1(1991), 66-90. doi:10.1093/iclqaj/40.1.66
- Powell, John A. “Righting the Law: Seeking a Humane Voice”. West Virginia Law Review, 96, (1993), 333.
- Rabin, Robert L. “Lawyers for Social Change: Perspectives on Public Interest Law”, Stanford Law Review, 28, 2(1976), 207-261. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228120
- Rhode, Deborah L. “Access to Justice”. Fordham Law Review, 69, 5(2001), 1785-1819. Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol69/iss5/11
- Rogovin, Mitchell & William D. Ruckelshaus. Balancing the Scales of Justice: Financing Public Interest Law in America. Washington: Council for Public Interest Law, 1976.
- Rotunda, Ronald D. & John E. Nowak. Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure, 5th edition. Eagan, Minnesota: West, 2012.
- Sathe, S.P. Judicial Activism in India: Transgressing Borders and Enforcing Limits. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2002.
- Schuck, Peter H. Meditations of a Militant Moderate: Cool Views on Hot Topics. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
- Shapiro, Martin. “The Success of Judicial Review and Democracy”, in Martin Shapiro and Alec Stone Sweet, On Law, Politics & Judicialization, London: Oxford University Press, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199256489.003.0005
- Silva, Fabio de Sa e. Lawyers and governance in a globalizing world: narratives of “public interest law” across the Americas. Boston, Massachusetts: Northeastern University, 2012. https://doi.org/10.17760/d20002743
- Singh, Parmanad. “Promises and Perils of Public Interest Litigation in India”, Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 52, 2(2010), 172-188. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43953493
- Soltero, Carlos R. “Miranda v. Arizona (1966) and the Rights of the Criminally Accused”, in Latinos and American Law: Landmark Supreme Court Cases (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2006), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.7560/713109-007
- Talisse, Robert. “Deliberation”, in David Estlund (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford Handbooks online edn, Oxford Academic, (2012), 204-222. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0011
- Vieira, Oscar Vilhena. “Public Interest Law: A Brazilian Perspective”. UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, 13, 1(2008), 219-261. available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/45302226
- Walzer, Michael. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
- Zelman, Joshua D. “Recent Developments in International Law: Anti-Terrorism Legislation - Part Two: The Impact and Consequences”, J. Transnational Law & Policy, 11, 2(2002), 421-441.
