نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The Human Rights Council's Commissions of Inquiry function as crucial non-judicial mechanisms through a model of "mediated supervision." By producing credible legal knowledge, they empower a network of actors—including courts, political bodies, and civil society- and through normative pressure, they pave the way for state accountability. The Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, established in 2021, exemplifies this function. It has generated credible knowledge by documenting recurring violation patterns, structurally analyzing Israeli policies, and employing progressive legal characterizations, including examination of the apartheid charge. Its integrated approach, combining international human rights law and international humanitarian law, provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing prolonged occupation.
In the network activation stage, the Commission's findings have empowered institutions like the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice by providing credible legal data for addressing the Palestine situation. The Gaza case study demonstrates how the Commission has challenged dominant legal narratives through integrated analysis of the siege, documentation of patterns violating distinction, proportionality, and precaution principles in recurring military operations, and by framing the "continuum of conflict" as a system of structural violence.
Despite limitations such as Israel's persistent non-cooperation, the Commission has played a catalytic role in shifting international discourse- reframing the issue from "conflict" to occupation and apartheid- and strengthening accountability processes before international judicial bodies.
کلیدواژهها English