عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]چکیده [English]
Conflict of evidence is one of the main and useful subjects at legal system of any countries. The main question which must be considered in this article, is for example in the situation of conflict between expert opinion and testimony, or conflict of testimony and hearsay or conflict of document and expert opinion, which one has more probative value and as a result will be taken priority. The main purpose of this article is to find a formula solution as to the Conflict of evidence in civil action. For this purpose first of all the evidence has been divided into legal evidence and persuasive and next by regarding to the necessary condition of contradiction, namely existence of at least two evidence, mutual incompatibility and rebut each other, unity of matters and probative validity, finally some rules and solution has been propounded through which we can solve the problems of contradiction between evidence.